The recent spate of similarly worded pieces by David P Kramer in a letter to Business Day on 21 April (see here) and by David Saks published the day before in Politicsweb (see here) referring to a previous ‘post’ by David Kramer are shoddily researched and tendentious to say the least.
They claim it is ironic that I was a signature to the SA BDS Coalition’s letter to the Judicial Service Commission objecting to the potential appointment of David Unterhalter to the Constitutional Court. Our objection was on the grounds of his position on the SAJBD - which he only vacated the month prior to his interview.
They state that Isie Maisel, a Jewish lawyer, defended my father, Dr Yusuf Dadoo, amongst the 156 Treason Trial defendants in 1956. Maisel also served on the SAJBDS and SAZF. The ‘irony’, according to Saks and Kramer, is that I would therefore have similarly objected to the man that helped ensure an acquittal for my father and the other detainees and saved them from the death sentence.
Had Saks and Kramer bothered to verify the information they probably found on Wikipedia they would have discovered that my father was not a defendant in the Treason Trial. He was under a banning order and was not able to openly attend the 1955 Congress of the People (CoP) which formed the key evidence leading to the raids and arrests the following year.
His mother Fatima (my grandmother) was present at the CoP to accept on his behalf the Isithwalandwe/Seaparankoe, the highest honour of the ANC, then also awarded to Chief Albert Luthuli and Father Trevor Huddleston. It is believed my father contravened his banning order and did attend illegally, under cover, for part of the proceedings but he managed to evade the security police.
What is ironic, however, is that my mother’s maiden name was Kramer so maybe David P Kramer and I are long-lost cousins! She, a South African Jew, was like my father a lifelong anti-apartheid activist in the South African Communist Party and thus an internationalist and anti-Zionist.