The State and Development
The other day, I was having a conversation with an economist mate of mine from varsity and we ended up discussing the manner in which government operates and the impact this has on the economy.
You see, my economist mate is from the neoliberal school of economics and he feels that the biggest problem that we have in this country is that the state is trying to drive the economy, whereas in his view it should be business that takes the lead in matters economic, with the state in the background merely playing the role of a referee.
His critique was that our plans to develop the economy, create jobs and materially improve the lives of our citizens are too state-centric. He gave the classical neoliberal riposte that the state and its technocrats should not be dictating the pace and direction of economic development. How, pray tell, he asked, can government bureaucrats be left to determine which industries should be stimulated in our economy in order to produce the greatest possible growth and development?
In his view, this is something best left to that nebulous thing called the markets to determine, as markets will by default eliminate those industries which are weak and promote those which are beneficial. He was adamant that we should be sticking to the mantra of “the market knows best” if we really want to build a strong economy.
My argument in return, was that what we need is an economic model that will not only produce growth within our economy, but in effect will develop and enhance the abilities, the capacity of those within the state. That, as opposed to a passive state, which is in the background being led by business, what was needed was a state with enhanced capacity to lead, manage and direct our country’s economic affairs. This of course entails modernisation of state systems and processes as well as a highly competent, efficient, effective bureaucracy.