RE-INVENTING GOVERNMENT THROUGH A REFERENDUM ON PROVINCES
We in the Azanian People's Organization (AZAPO) always maintained that South Africa/Azania is a unitary state. This would explain why AZAPO is opposed to the balkanization of Azania into quasi-federal states previously known as Bantustans now Provinces. Since entering parliamentary politics in 1999, AZAPO consistently called for the abolishment of provinces as currently constituted. In practical terms this means Chapter 6 institutions enshrined in the liberal SA Constitution should be scrapped.
Following debates of his SONA, President Zuma challenged all those who call for provinces to be abolished to make a convincing argument and provide sound reasons why provinces should be scrapped. AZAPO finds the President's "challenge" problematic considering that when the agreement on provinces was concluded, no convincing argument was put forward to the nation.
Instead the ruling ANC appeased the then Nationalist Party, Afrikaner right-wingers, white liberals in general and other federalists at the World Trade Centre talks. So far provinces have proved to promote regionalism, tribalism, ethnicity and economic inequality. For instance provinces such as Gauteng and the Western Cape are economically prosperous compared to rural ones such as Limpopo, Northern Cape and Eastern Cape which remain impoverished. It is this economic divide and neglect for rural development that force the poor black people to leave their rural homes and move to urban areas.
This pattern is no different to that of the apartheid years, which induced labour migrations. Needles to mention consequences were and are still dire for black people - i.e. landlessness, unemployment, unstable families and lack of adequate amenities. The picture above makes for a compelling case for President Zuma and his government to act and abolish provinces.
The situation in the Eastern Cape, Gauteng and Limpopo provinces where section 100 of the constitution was invoked has shown that central government intervention is not the answer. Equally in municipalities where section 139 was invoked not much has changed either. The problem is therefore systemic.