There is every reason to hope that the restructuring of the courts under Minister of Justice Jeff Radebe will be a more considered process than the attempted assault on judicial independence by Minister Bridget Mabandla and her Deputy, Johnny de Lange after the 2004 election.
At that time, the judiciary was shocked at the inclusion of provisions in the then 14th Constitutional Amendment Bill and the Superior Courts Bill which would have allowed the government to take administrative control of the courts as well as other provisions which had not been discussed with the judges.
By contrast, a new (19th) Constitutional Amendment Bill and a revised Superior Courts Bill will only be published after the views of the judiciary have been received and considered, as the Minister has advised me in reply to a Parliamentary question (number 154). In addition, I believe that the Minister agreed at a meeting with the Chief Justice and Heads of Court in early June to proceed with the rationalisation of the areas of jurisdiction of all courts but to leave the contentious aspects of the Mabandla policy aside for discussion.
The Minister's reply to my question confirms that general jurisdiction is to be conferred on the Constitutional Court as our new apex court. This development, long under discussion, is to be welcomed. As now-retired Constitutional Court Judge Kate O'Regan has said, "a split or two-peak system has created difficulty in making sure that the Constitution really roots itself in our broader legal system."
Although much will depend on the actual provisions of both the new Constitutional Amendment and the new superior Courts Bill, the inclusion of the Labour Appeal Court in the Supreme Court of Appeal and the conversion of special courts into divisions of the High Court are proposals that have merit.
It is understood that our new Chief Justice Ngcobo is committed to retaining the administrative control of the courts. The indications are the tumult of the immediate past is behind us.