RONALD LAMOLA'S CALL FOR AN ACT AS FORCEFUL AS WAR
The FW de Klerk Foundation is deeply concerned over comments made by ANC Youth League deputy-president Ronald Lamola in Durban on 19 June, during a lecture at the Durban University of Technology. Lamola called for the expropriation of land without compensation. He said youth unemployment could not be dealt with unless land was expropriated. Lamola also stated that, "it is an illusion if South Africans believe they can get their land back peacefully" and "we need an act as forceful as war to bring it back to the Africans".
Our Constitution requires us to "heal the divisions of the past and to establish a society based on democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights." Section 16 states that the right to freedom of expression does not extend to (a) propaganda for war; (b) incitement of imminent violence; or (c) advocacy of hatred that is based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion, and that constitutes incitement to cause harm."
According to section 10 (1) of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act, "no person may publish, propagate, advocate or communicate words based on one or more of the prohibited grounds, against any person that could reasonably be construed to demonstrate a clear intention to (a) be hurtful; (b) be harmful or to incite harm; or (c) promote or propagate hatred."
Mr Lamola's outburst could well be construed as demonstrating a clear intention to be harmful or to incite harm, and might also be viewed as propaganda for war. But would it help if further charges were laid against Lamola in the courts, or the Human Rights Commission?
The problem is not, in the first place, the incendiary language used by an uninformed youth leader to a scraggly audience of only 150 comrades. It is that the ANC has done nothing at all to call Lamola to order, or to require that he should behave in a responsible and constitutional manner. On the contrary, its inaction and some of its actions and statements appear to condone the racially provocative and divisive views of Lamola and his predecessor, Julius Malema.