THE GOLDSTONE REPORT NEEDS BETTER EVALUATION
The Goldstone Report on Gaza was commissioned by the United Nations Human Rights Commission to examine what happened in Gaza in the three weeks of the Israeli invasion - the so-called Operation Cast Lead.
It is a report of over 400 pages and the media in the West have succeeded in avoiding any emphasis on its main research and conclusions. The picture generally painted is of two sides confronting each other and both committing crimes against humanity. It does mention the disproportionate action of the Israeli armed forces, but is not able to blame Israel for the wholesale massacre of Palestinians.
The destruction of civilian facilities such as schools, mosques, legislative buildings, water and sanitation plants make it clear to any unbiased observer that the Israelis are hell-bent on punishing all the Palestinians in Gaza even more than the siege which was already destroying their economy.
The puny rocket attacks from Gaza on Israeli targets were not very effective by any standard and only provided the Israelis with an excuse to launch a genocidal attack which had been well-planned years before the event. Goldstone narrates that most of those attacks before the Israeli invasion were launched by other militant groups and not by Hamas or even its allies. In any event, such attacks only intensified after the Israeli invasion of Gaza.
The most important feature of the report was the clarity it gave to the nature of the conflict. It is not just a clash of two sides that equally ignore human rights and are of equal strength. It is the Palestinians who are occupied and have their rights violated whilst it is the powerful state of Israel that imposes its will and continues to disrupt Palestinian justifiable demands.