Where to now? "COPE-ing with a Heartfelt headache"
Most members of COPE, especially those who were at the battle of Heartfelt, woke up with a massive hangover this December even before the festive season started properly. This one was not caused by alcohol, but by the acute realisation that too much factionalism had taken its toll. With 2 "Presidents", like those who have over-indulged, members and the general public think COPE is seeing double.
It's an illusion of course, but for the public, it is a massive confusion. COPE has been thrown into a communications and public relations nightmare. Our detractors are once again predicting our imminent demise. As a party, we do need to thank loyal COPE members and supporters for sticking by their party even though it has cost them dearly. These will ensure that COPE does not die. The challenge we all face is; where to from here?
We should be the first to admit that in the heat of a political fight, we pull no punches. Having witnessed the recent acts of political carnage in the SACP, the ANC and COSATU, we thought that COPE would be different. We all said that it would be. We said we would; 'defend the Constitution, the rule of law, fight corruption, restore hope and bring change'. While we have done some of that, we have also, collectively, done a lot of damage to South Africa's hope for change and believe in a real alternative to the corruption, patronage and mediocrity of the ruling party.
Instead, in their quest for political office, some of COPE's leaders have undermined the party's constitution, some have broken the law and some have tolerated and even promoted corruption and patronage. As for hope and change, this message has gotten completely lost.
The reasons for this are complex and have been explained many times before. But to the public, this matters little. Theirs is a simple request; 'sort out this leadership squabble and get a move on. We need a strong, alternative party to counter the degenerate ruling party. Thus far COPE has seemed too preoccupied with internal issues to care about the voters'.