The debate about the Reserve Bank's mandate should not be the preserve of the so called experts
5 July 2017
The Congress of South African Trade unions has taken note of an open letter by a group of academics and economists calling for a debate about the Reserve Bank’s mandate to be conducted by experts in the open. While we have no objections with the suggestion for an open debate about the mandate of the Reserve Bank, we do not agree that the debate should only be the preserve of the so called experts or academics.
The federation argues that some of the most disastrous policies in this country that have left millions of poor people unemployed and mired in poverty were brought to us by the so called experts. The problem with “experts” is that they are hired by other people and are not autonomously financed. This means that they cannot be regarded as neutral because sometimes they are used as authoritative voices to push certain narrow agendas on behalf of those that pay them.
The question of whether or not the PP was empowered to make a call to Parliament to change the mandate of the reserve bank from price stability to broader socioeconomic issues is a valid one; but it should not be used to censor the debate about the role and mandate of the Reserve Bank.
We subscribe to the view that no policy measure can be neutral. The reaction to the PP’s recommendation clearly shows that within the ruling elite there are those who are happy with the status quo , where millions are isolated from the mainstream economy. This policy issue should not be treated as taboo because it is not natural law.