ANC'S media tribunal: Let the free media regulate itself
ANC Secretary-General, Gwede Mantashe's contention that a media tribunal is required to deal with the so-called "dearth of media ethics" in South Africa runs entirely contrary to the constitutionally-enshrined principle of media freedom which Mr Mantashe also claims to champion (see Business Day report).
If, by "dearth in media ethics" he is referring to episodes such as the scandalous and shameful practice of "brown envelope journalism" - the most recent example of which is the allegation by former Cape Argus reporter Ashley Smith that he was paid by former-Premier, Ebrahim Rasool to produce favourable copy about Rasool to help him fight his political battles within the Western Cape ANC - then Mr Mantashe's concern is valid and it is indeed crucial that measures to prevent this kind of decay are strengthened.
Those measures, however, should not be spearheaded and/or run by the government, since this involvement in itself would constitute a breach of the media freedom articulated in the Constitution. The ANC's proposal of a media tribunal - and Mr Mantashe's contention that he does not "...think that the media can call on one of its (sic) own to adjudicate matters concerning them" - implies that the ANC favours an interventionist approach.
Unfortunately, the ANC's concerns in this regard have little to do with strengthening the 4th estate, and everything to do with exerting control over how the media portray the new, post-Polokwane administration of the governing party. As much has been articulated in the Polokwane conference resolution on "Communications & the Battle of Ideas", which states, amongst other things, that: