JOHANNESBURG - Over the past several months COSATU has been pushing for the ANC government to adopt what it calls a New Growth Path. They seem to have had some success in this regard with their Man in Pretoria, Ebrahim Patel, producing a framework document after Cabinet endorsed the idea. In the ANC's January 8th statement Jacob Zuma claimed that "we have put in place a New Growth Path" that would make the creation of jobs the central focus of government's economic policies.
On the face of it there appears to be much to be welcomed about the way COSATU, and the Left, is pushing for a greater focus on job creation; as well as its unforgiving critique of the failures of ANC government over the past fifteen years. What is there to be feared, one might ask, from a project underpinned by such good intentions?
There is, however, real danger in the trajectory being followed by the "New Growth Path" proponents.
It is common today to ascribe the National Party's policy of apartheid to crude racism. While such motives were indeed present what is often forgotten is that this policy of total segregation also enjoyed the support of many idealistic intellectuals in the Afrikaner nationalist movement.
In 1956 the great South African historian, C.W. de Kiewiet, observed how the major pronouncements on racial policy by such men were often "remarkable for their frank avowal of the inequities and deficiencies from which the native population suffers." Apartheid would, however, allow the black African to "escape from his unhappy and unequal position in an alien [white] society." Once in his own homeland, "separate from the world of the white man", there would "be no passes or curfew, no social indignity, no nightly routine of police raids and arrests."
The flaw in their scheme, as De Kiewiet noted, was that it represented "a transfer of the responsibilities of the living world to a dream world of solved problems. It is the substitution of a wishful simplicity for a real complexity."