Human rights history made as African Commission declares Zimbabwean farmers' case admissible
The campaign to restore the rule of law in Zimbabwe and to reinstate the international court of the SADC Tribunal after its suspension by the SADC Heads of State in August 2011 has seen an important breakthrough.
The African Commission today ruled that the complaint lodged with it on behalf of Zimbabwean farmers Luke Tembani and Ben Freeth against 14 heads of state of SADC countries was admissible despite preliminary procedural objections raised against it by amongst others Tanzania.
The ruling was made at the 52nd Ordinary Session of the African Commission on Human and People's Rights held atYamoussoukro, Cote d'Ivoire.
The complaint by Tembani and Freeth related to the decision of the SADC Summit at Maputo in July to suspend the SADC Tribunal, which in a series of rulings had held the Government of Zimbabwe in breach of the SADC Treaty and other international legal obligations.
The approach to the African Commission followed an earlier urgent application submitted by a legal team led by Adv. Jeremy Gauntlett, SC, a leading South African advocate, to the SADC Tribunal in April 2011. The application asked for an order that would ensure the SADC Tribunal would continue to function in all respects as established by Article 16 of the SADC Treaty. It was the first time in legal history that a group of heads of state was cited by an individual as the respondent in an application to an international court.