The youth must be decisively represented in the Magokgoane Communal Property Association - CYPoM
Mafikeng - The Concerned Young People of Magokgoane (CYPoM) is a non-profit organisation which shall act as an advocate for change within the jurisdiction of the Magokgoane community, currently located in Ramatlabama, Mafikeng. The aims and objectives of this organisation are to champion a progressive developmental agenda on behalf of the Magokgoane youth, and to pioneer the implementation of such an agenda across all administrative functions preformed within or on behalf of the community.
The CYPoM notes the events that took place at a general meeting in ‘Old Magokgoane' (Koster) on the 27th February 2010 as part of the land restitution process, where the community was to elect the Communal Property Association in terms of the Communal Property Association Act of 1996. We welcome the ultimate decision to abandon the election process, but we remain concerned that such a decision was primarily influenced by an Act of God (lack of sufficient lighting) and not a genuine will on the part of those conducting the meeting to secure a free and fair electoral process. We wish to expand on some of these undesirable tendencies, with the hope that they will not be repeated when the community reconvenes the general meeting on a later date (presumably 27th March 2010).
The conduct of the Regional Land Claims Commissioners (Gauteng and North West)
It is our firm belief that (i) the general meeting is the highest decision making body on all community matters relating to land restitution; (ii) that community members do not only have the right to attend and vote, but also the right to speak, and (iii) that any decision taken at a general meeting must be decided by voting.
We find it unfortunate that the chairperson of the meeting saw it fit to bulldoze all the principles identified above, thus positioning himself as some sort of a dictator in matters that directly affect the community. Such conduct is not only undemocratic but also unconstitutional. We remain resolute that neither the concerns of time nor elements of disruptive behavior are sufficient to negate the rights of members to speak, and to take decisions on any matters brought to the floor.