FMF delighted by historic High Court judgement in LRA constitutional challenge
4 May 2016
The Free Market Foundation (FMF) is delighted by the judgment handed down today and welcomes the court’s finding that extension of Bargaining Council Agreements (BCAs) to non-parties should not be automatic and mandatory. It is bad news for advocates of compulsion by narrow vested interest and good news for eight million destitute job seekers, thousands of small, marginal and prospective employers, and all compassionate South Africans.
The FMF is surprised by the reaction of Cosatu and Numsa who regard the judgement as their victory. It is a Pyrrhic victory, which is one which leaves the ‘victor’ worse off. They clearly do not understand the FMF’s motives or the judgement. The ruling is a fatal blow to their view that they should have the power to force the minister to extend self-serving contracts that discriminate against their rivals and victims.
The court’s view, as argued by the FMF, is that the rights of vulnerable workers and employers, and the country as a whole, must be respected. The FMF’s objective can be achieved, without the need to change S 32* of the LRA, by subjecting labour law to administrative justice. In terms of the judgement, the extension of BCAs is subject to the administrative justice clause in the constitution and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA).
It is now clear that the implications of extending BCAs must be considered at three stages instead of only one as requested by the FMF. Instead of merely permitting the Minister of Labour to consider her actions before extending BCAs, the court’s view is that, the agreement, the request to extend it to non-parties and the minister’s decision to grant the extension are all subject to PAJA.