It has become fashionable among some of the clever people in the media who tell the rest of us what to think to attack South Africa’s Leader of the Opposition, Mmusi Maimane.
The most egregious example was the “mini-Mandela” episode. Maimane said he was being attacked as a mini-Mandela who was a sell-out, just like Mandela. His comment was carefully edited and then presented as though he was bragging about being a mini-Mandela. He was misrepresented as a vainglorious show-off, daring to compare himself with Mandela.
Many commentators copied each other’s criticism, without doing the basic check revealing the lie they perpetuated. Some opponents of the DA gave much patronising advice to Maimane, aimed at breaking him and his party down. A few apologised; most have not. They all overlooked the effort by some people to cast Mandela as a villain in order to undo the 1994 consensus, abandoning the ability of black and white South Africans to work together to address the injustices of the past and making race the cause of our problems.
Maimane has a tough job. He did not complain about this in a recent wide-ranging interview with the writer, but he expanded at length on the DA and its mission, still going back to the days of Helen Suzman.
His party is the most diverse in the country’s history, supported by more than four million voters. Unlike the ANC and the EFF, both of which have so little white support that it is not even worth mentioning, Maimane’s DA enjoys the support of most of the voters who are white (now only 8% of the electorate), plus millions of black, coloured and Indian voters. The DA cannot simply concentrate on “white interests” like some smaller parties. It wants to and needs to accommodate and promote the interests of the whole community, black and white. Maimane assures the voters that the DA mission for a generation and more remains; it is the only party truly committed to the inspiring values of the Constitution with all their consequences.
Those interests are essentially the same but people in different groups often see things through different eyes. We need to learn to understand that.