No meaningful clemency and reconciliation at the University of Cape Town (UCT) without consultation, knowledge-transparency and representation
Some questions for the UCT Executive and its myriad of spokespeople.
So, once again, the UCT Executive wants to grant clemency to repeated, unapologetic lawbreakers, some of whom will negotiate the future of UCT. What are their names? Please list their offenses.
Why take this action? Is it to carrying on further ‘negotiations’ to determine UCT’s future?
First, who is negotiating UCT’s future? What is their mandate? Whom do they represent? Will their ‘electorate’ honour their commitments?
On the UCT side of the table is “management” limply endorsed by senior academics (Senate) and UCT’s governing body (Council). Please provide the names and portfolios of these managers other than yourself. Whom (if anyone) represents the rank-and-file academics, non-academic support staff, alumni, fee-paying parents, donors and the vast “silenced” majority of students (even protesters) who overwhelmingly and desperately want (fruitlessly demanding a referendum to prove this) to get on with research and education? What about representation from the Department of Higher Education?