From a dictatorship to democracy in Zimbabwe
A tyranny does not necessarily have to be violent. Ask Zimbabweans. Actually, a non violent one is more pervasive, more real as citizens begin to believe that there is no outside. IN Zimbabwe, it has created a persuasive and repetitive myth that only one man can be President for life; that only ZANU (PF) members can have access to new opportunities and lead a better life than most; that only those who are politically connected through birth, association or sheer audacity must have an advantage and be entitled unbridled access to the wealth of Zimbabwe. That only our "freedom" fighters can be heroes.
I have written on the Zimbabwean dictatorship before but now I have actually seen and smelt how deep it is.
It will not be easy to change our circumstances or move our country into a modern democracy because we have been psychologically complicit in creating a social system that does not respect our own needs and aspirations. Out tyranny is manufactured by the people of Zimbabwe, for the people of Zimbabwe; that is the hardest fact to accept.
You see, dictatorships can only arise and flourish where very specific conditions are met. Critical to an effective dictatorship, are people with a low self esteem and who have a victim mentality. People who believe it is outside them that change can emanate. In such instances, the political leadership must also meet these same conditions; they must have a destructive and incessant low self esteem and must therefore, put to good use all tools and forms of oppression to shield their egos and vulnerability. They must continually claim all that is good in society, and blame all that is bad on others. This works in arresting potential, stifling growth, spreading poverty and hopelessness so that citizens may remain complaints to a system that they abhor.
Dictators mirror their low self esteem on the society which they seek to oppress and in that society, must be those individuals who are willing to support that low self esteem with theirs.