Zimbabwe: The crooked timber of humanity
No country can ever progress significantly without some consensus and collective momentum towards ideas about its future
Nandan Nilekani, the author of the book: "Imagining India: The Idea of a Renewed Nation" left some fascinating ideas in my mind with regard to my country Zimbabwe, and where it is going. In his video about the book, he speaks about ideas that have arrived, ideas in contest and ideas in anticipation. I have found it a very valuable way of imagining Zimbabwe's probable future.
In case of Zimbabwe, despite all the intellectual capital we have, I do not think that we have created a broad church of consensus about the future. I noticed with interest, for example, that they were two mining conferences going on in the same week, several investment conferences and many more on this sector and that sector. We seem to talk a lot here in Harare! What is further disturbing is that, each group, gathering or conference has its own agendas and ideas about the future. This has resulted in disjointed efforts towards creating a progressive business and socio-political environment. Added to this, are the political parties who seem not only to have different ideas about the future, but unnecessarily slug it out daily in public arena creating an environment of confusion and paralysis.
If we begin to talk about ideas that have arrived, it is clear that everyone now accepts that we must have a new constitution, that local Zimbabweans must now play a more meaningful ownership role in shaping their own future. Thank goodness the era of dictatorship by politicians is fast coming to an end. The idea of a new democracy underpinned by the right of every Zimbabweans to pursue their ambitions has now arrived.
Ideas in contest, include the extent of the deepening of a new emerging democracy in Zimbabwe, and the role of a powerless ZANU(PF). Will it play a constructive or destructive role in a new dispensation? Zimbabweans have really never tasted a participative democracy and, although this is an idea whose time has arrived, one can contest the likely nature and extent of an open society that we seek to create. In other words, each one of us has their own ideas about what democracy really means and it will take some doing to attain a national consensus on what it really means despite us having a new constitution.