LAST week's other parliamentary fiasco came on Wednesday, with the debate on National Women's Day, which was given this rather clumsy title by whoever organises these things: "Celebrating the 60th anniversary of the Women's Charter and 20 Years of Freedom: Together Moving a Non-Racial, Non-Sexist South Africa Forward."
Now, "fiasco" may seem strong, suggestive of the sort of chaos that erupted with the Economic Freedom Fighters' disruption of proceedings in the National Assembly on Thursday.
But no, this was a mess because the debate was largely ignored. I cannot begin to understand why no-one thought it important. Actually, I can, but more of that later.
True, great stretches of it were exceptionally dull, with speeches that plumbed new depths in tedium. Minister in the Presidency Susan Shabangu's was a case in point, a monotonous jumble of statistics: we have so many women doing this and that, in the top positions here and there, but not so many doing whatever and the other.
Interest didn't wane so much as ossify.
Of course, Shabangu did point out she herself had come some way topwards in her own career. As a woman. With responsibilities. Or as she put it: