Replicate the Bafokeng local economic development model in other traditional communities
This year marks the 100 year anniversary of the promulgation of the 2013 Land Act. This act robbed black Africans of 87 percent of their land and turned them into refugees in their land of birth. The ANC should be commended for returning huge chunks of land to the descendants of the previous indigenous owners through the land restitution policy. When they became the governing party in 1994, they set the land restitution process in motion and thousands of land claims, lodged with the Commission on Restitution of Land Rights, have been settled.
Despite land restitution initiatives, most communities in South Africa are underserviced and still people live in abject poverty. Unemployment is growing and 25% of the population rely on government's social grants.
Many who leave rural areas to look for employment in cities have left huge pieces of unused land that were obtained through restitution. . While land restitution has restored land ownership the anticipated economic benefits to these new land owners have been mixed.
While a few promising family-based agricultural projects are emerging, there are a number of areas where the restored owners have failed to make productive use of land. Failure to use the land for agricultural purposes has mostly been attributed to the state. I find this expectation to be unrealistic; it is not possible for government to provide for all the needs of each citizen and community.
The exploitation of the land is the responsibility of local communities and should not only limited to agriculture. The Barolong, for example, in the North West, intend to work with South African National Parks and North West Parks and Tourism, to establish the first national park in the province to be called the Highveld National Park.