GIVEN the slow pace of land reform in South Africa, a certain degree of mania, if not outright hysteria was to be expected from the usual suspects with regard to the centenary on Wednesday of the Natives' Land Act.
However, here at the Mahogany Ridge even the most cynical of the regulars were taken aback at the attempts to link the auction earlier this month of Julius Malema's cabbage patch in Limpopo to the legacy of the legislation that went on to become a cornerstone of apartheid. What really should have been an occasion rich in irony was apparently now sadly symbolic of a far larger malaise.
The farm sale, for example, had plunged Malaika wa Azania - a self-described "non-partisan pan-Africanist socialist activist" with a silly name - into an "absolute rage". Thus unhinged she'd bashed away at her Mail&Guardian Thought Leader blog: "It signals a tragic legitimisation of a historical injustice against black people; an injustice that continues to devour the little bit of dignity that we have left in the face of the onslaught of white monopoly capital."
Wa Azania's problem, of course, was that some boere had bought the farm - and at a bargain price to boot. "So," she fumed, "not only have white people stolen land from us: they can now even buy it for half what it is worth at auctions after it has been taken from black people."
Xolela Mangcu, author of Biko: A Biography, argued much the same thing, albeit in a more considered fashion, in The Sowetan. The sale, he wrote, "restored to [the purchasers] a puniest bit [of land] that has been put in black hands since 1994".
There is something perhaps dishonest about this assertion. It suggests that Malema came to be a gentleman farmer through the land restitution process. This was not the case, and Mangcu is well aware the farm was bought on an open market.