Reserve Bank must investigate banks' business relationships with the Guptas
18 April 2016
I have requested the South African Reserve Bank to conduct an investigation into whether certain banks, which had business relationships with the Guptas, complied with all the relevant provisions of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act (No. 38 of 2001), particularly their obligations to conduct enhanced due diligence of Politically Exposed Persons.
We know certain banks terminated their business relationships with Oakbay Investments and its subsidiaries, including Oakbay Resources and Energy, which are controlled by the Guptas. However, these banks appear to have done so when the political weather changed: they only acted after the political fallout caused by the Deputy Minister of Finance, Mcebisi Jonas’s public statement, on 16 March 2016, claiming he had been offered the position of Minister of Finance by the Guptas, weeks before the firing on the Minister of Finance, Nhlanhla Nene, on 09 December 2015.
The sudden decision by certain banks to terminate their business relationships with the Guptas raises a serious question: did these banks comply with the relevant provisions of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act (No. 38 of 2001)before the political fallout and their sudden decision to terminate their business relationships with the Guptas?
The Financial Intelligence Centre’s Guidance Note 3A, which has been in force since 28 March 2013, requires banks to take reasonable steps to establish the source of funds, and to conduct enhanced monitoring of business relationships with (1) Politically Exposed Persons; (2) families of Politically Exposed Persons and (3) closely associated persons of Politically Exposed Persons.