Jiba Review: The fight for the supremacy of the Constitution continues
12 February 2016
Once again President Jacob Zuma’s irrational decisions are the subject of judicial review. In this instance the DA is in the midst of a review application requesting the Western Cape High Court to set aside President Zuma’s decision not to suspend and order a Commission of Inquiry into the sitting deputy National Director of Public Prosecutions (NDPP), Nomgcobo Jiba, despite many calls to do so by the former NDPP, Mxolisi Nxasana.
In our founding affidavit the DA submits that, given the prima facie evidence of Ms Jiba’s long list of failings and improper conduct, President Jacob Zuma, acting in accordance with section 179(1)(a) of the Constitution read with section 12(6)(a) of the NPA Act, should have suspended her pending a formal inquiry into her suitability to continue as the second-in-command at the NPA. The DA ask for an order that she be suspended and a Commission of Inquiry be instituted.
Ms Jiba has received a litany of criticisms from judges in court judgments, including for obvious bias and a lack of fitness to hold office. Ms Jiba has also displayed a level of impunity that could only be informed by the protection provided by those senior political leadership. Ms Jiba has:
been criticised for refusing to cooperate in an Inquiry in the NPA senior management.