WHO IZAK SMUTS REALLY IS
I do not intend to participate in the debate on the transformation of the legal profession that has arisen between Lucky Thekisho and Izak Smuts, as it is not my sphere of experience or expertise. Given, however, that Thekisho's argument is premised on an ad hominem attack on the character and track record of Smuts, I record that I have known Smuts for 39 years, and am able to correct the misrepresentation of his history, which may shed light on the value of Thekisho's contribution to the debate.
Thekisho alleges that "Smuts showed no activist or progressive role against apartheid. He played absolutely no role in bringing about the democratic dispensation in South Africa. As a matter of fact, he was the advocate of choice of Oupa Gozo, the tin pot dictator of the Ciskei..."
An examination of his record will, amongst other involvement, reveal the following:
Smuts was in fact an outspoken critic of the National Party government while a university student, perhaps best illustrated by his contribution at a protest meeting at Rhodes University after the murder of Bantu Stephen Biko, where, in his capacity as deputy president of the SRC, he shared a platform with Wendy Woods, René de Villiers MP, and Professors David Welsh and Rodney Davenport.
As a young advocate at the Grahamstown bar, he convened the first meeting and, for the next three years, served as the first chairman, of the Grahamstown branch of Lawyers for Human Rights, at a time when the country was subject to recurring declarations of a state of emergency.