Much of what Moeletsi Mbeki says in his book, Architects of Poverty, we already know. What is enjoyable is its collection and aggregation. Mbeki uses fresh descriptions to argue a cogent thesis that runs through the book like a thread of fine stitches. He's undidactic and intelligent without being formulaic. Simply put Mbeki's thesis can be captured as this:
- Africa, after its colonial past, has been governed by political elites who ended up copying qualities of colonialists in the name of African nationalism
- African elites, who are mostly black, are a non productive group, and live by a symbiotic parasitic relationship to state's resources through political connection (they see the state as essentially distributive rather than developmental)
- They blackmail capitalist oligarchies to give their profits windfalls, otherwise known as BEE
- Political elites have little to no original innovation (business wise) and have no control over productive economy; their thinking is largely controlled by foreign forces in the form of global corporations, or capitalist oligarchs
- Models of solutions provided by institutions like World Bank or IMF have not been good for African development
- The rule of political elite in Africa has so far led to initial development after independence, but that petered away after a few years, living behind deteriorating to collapsing infrastructure, massive brain drainage, and capital flight
- When threatened by the political forces of change the political elites suppress them, with violence if need be; and are not averse to using their political power to advance the tyranny of their big men rule to preserve the status quo of their power
- Or they make cosmetic changes, replacing one big man with the other that serves a different group of even greedier political elites
Mbeki thinks "Is a new middle class emerging in Africa that can provide the leadership required to drive the continent's industrial and agrarian revolutions in the face of foreign interventions that foster the continent's traditional role in the world economy as a source of raw materials and cheap labour?" Is his hope on the new emerging African middle class justified?
Sometimes when I see how the black middle class, especially, has fallen for the consumerist culture at the expense of real innovation and development, I feel Mbeki's hope is far fetched. But the good thing about middle class consumerism is that, by default, it demands innovation to keep up the demand and supply. So the question is whether we have what it takes to become a real productive class. There's a certain mental attitude we should adopt to fulfil this challenge; liberty driven thinking is at the centre of it. Liberty is a revolutionary doctrine that sometimes develops through vaunting out regressive tradition.
Another fresh quality in Mbeki's narrative-a scarce resource in African analysts who are forever looking over their shoulders to see how their argument will be understood in black political circles-is the manner by which he's not afraid to venture to wherever logic leads him, and makes no apologies for it. "Many foreign businesses survived as best they could by corrupting the new elite or finding ways of ingratiating themselves with their new masters. In some Western countries companies got tax breaks if they were able to bribe African government officials."
Mbeki says African elites foster the continent's underdevelopment with their operations of diverting economic profits to ‘consumption and capital flight' while assisting the axe of de-industrialisation by not investing in the manufacturing sector. Mbeki is not a rigorously analytical scribe. This does not necessary belittle the merits of his book, after all obsessive analysis can sometimes stupefy. But cogent as his argument might be sometimes it feels rushed. The history of our country is certainly hushed and abridged, which is understandable for the book of such small length.
Mbeki helped at least one reader to understand the prevalence for socialist rhetoric in disguise of vacuous capitalist consumerism within the Liberation Movement (LM) itself. "The social democracy of black elites was, however, not influenced by the doctrines of socialism. Rather, it was based on statist economic models which its creators saw as a way of breaking the power of the white owned corporations, thus creating the possibility of the black elite entering the business." It is just another trick of the black elite.