In his article “Afrikaans and the DA: A Reply to Hermann Giliomee” (Beeld and Politicsweb) Douglas Gibson manages to misunderstand my argument completely
I wrote positively about the DA’s policy of cultural pluralism that held sway until 2015 and more specifically its stance with respect to Afrikaans as a language of instruction. It was highlighted on 14 November 2015, when there was a heated debate in the process of drafting a new language policy for the University of Stellenbosch.
On that day Prof. Belinda Bozzoli, the DA’s Shadow Minister for Higher Education and Training, issued a very strong statement in favour of Afrikaans as a medium of instruction. She stated that the proposed policy of the US management to make English the primary language of instruction represents a violation of the constitutional right of every person to be taught in an official language of his or her choice where it is feasible in practice.
Prof. Bozzoli also expressed serious concern about the university’s lack of consultation around language policy. The US ignored Prof Bozzoli’s statement.
As the party in power in the Western Cape - and as such responsible for primary and secondary education in the province - the DA has a particularly strong interest in schools using the best medium of instruction. The memorandum submitted by the federation of the controlling bodies of South African schools (best known by its acronym Fedsas) offered a very good pointer.
Nearly 2 000 schools countrywide, of which more than 400 schools are located in the Western Cape, are affiliated to Fedsas. In its memorandum to the US management Fedsas stated that its members were unanimously in favour of the maintenance of Afrikaans as a fully-fledged language of instruction. It urged the university to maintain Afrikaans as the dominant mode of instruction as it was before 2000. As the only university in the province that uses Afrikaans medium it ought to promote Afrikaans and continue to foster its development.