IT'S unsurprising that our defensive ruling elite should blame the food they gorge on for their obesity. Scoff if you must - and many have - but our stoutish MPs have a serious beef about the fare in the parliamentary canteen.
Fat, of course, is the last taboo, and here at the Mahogany Ridge we are loath to make fun of the tubbies. This is because of various class and cultural considerations and the very real fear that some of them may even roll around here and, like, just sit on us.
However, as it was ANC MP Sheila Sithole who brought this matter to the nation's attention - squeezed out of the closet, as it were - we feel duty-bound to weigh in (forgive me) on the issue.
Sithole reportedly informed an induction workshop that the food served to MPs was a health risk. "If you look at members," she was quoted as saying, "they come here nice and slim but they all go out obese. That is very serious, so I want a situation where there is a serious discussion between yourselves [parliament's management] and the kitchen."
And the kitchen, it seems, can certainly dish it up. On a typical day, MPs would tuck into sandwiches, diverse yoghurts, fruit, coffee, tea and fizzy drinks. That's breakfast. The three-course lunches start with soups and salads followed by steaks, chicken, lamb or fish followed by dessert. Should meetings run into the lunch hour, busy MPs have to make do with "finger foods" such as lamb chops, roast chicken, samosas, hake medallions and Russians.
Newspapers around the world have had a bit of fun with the story. The Times of London, for example, drily noted: "Greedy politicians in South Africa have finally confirmed what their voters have long suspected: the bigger their stomachs are, they longer they have been in office."