Airbrushing History: Debating Rhodes' Legacy
As the debate raged in Cape Town over whether to remove the statue of the British Imperialist Cecil John Rhodes, I found myself in a grand house named after him some 6000 miles away. Rhodes House is the quaint Oxford-based headquarters of the Rhodes Scholarships.
Named for and funded by Rhodes, the Scholarships are awarded annually to individuals from around the world - largely former British colonies - to pursue graduate study at the University of Oxford. Having won one of these last year, it did not escape me that while his legacy was being viscerally debated back home, abroad everything seemed okay.
But it isn't. Rhodes' legacy is one of the most devastating wounds inflicted upon the African continent. Through his relentless pursuit of wealth and power, people's lives, freedom, and dignity were not spared.
His ‘visionary' project is, by-and-large, a significant cause of the many problems African countries, including my own, experience today. The patterns of development, urban migration, and their associated ills are not coincidental. It is the very basis upon which many systems of structural privilege, most notably white privilege, are contingent upon.
It is in this context that I choose to view the #RhodesMustFall debate that currently dominates UCT.