FROM THE MARGINS
Let's start with a shout-out to the heroes of the Thai cave rescue. This includes, of course, the divers risking their lives daily in the 4 km partly underwater trek to the 12 boys and their coach who miraculously survived for 10 days in the pitch-dark of what so easily could have been their underground tomb. But it also includes the rest of the huge rescue team, from technicians to doctors, and the countries and firms supplying specialised equipment in what must be one of the most dramatic rescues of modern times.
This episode reminds us of the best in the human spirit capable of setting aside tribal animosities, prejudices, fear and narrow self-interest in pursuit of a unifying mission. But sceptics, like me, may say that even while this feel-good drama is proceeding there are more unnecessary and tragic deaths daily in the Western Cape alone than in that Thai cave. And that these deaths are ignored except to perhaps to score political points.
But that's not quite right either. In fact, humans are the dominant species precisely because we are the ultra-cooperators of the biological kingdom. Evolution, to use a teleological turn of phrase and to simplify enormously, has equipped us with the basic emotional and cognitive equipment to balance self-interest and cooperation in such a way as to maximise our net reproductive fitness; or so the conventional dogma goes. It does not go far enough.
The fact is that we're just beginning to get to grips with the dimensions and implications of the human socio-cultural-technological niche, encapsulated in the term "the Anthropocene". This terminology, and the set of evolving ideas it incorporates, has hardly entered the political sphere even within the educated corners of the global niche. Yet our happiness and even existence depends upon us understanding this idea and learning how to regulate and coordinate human behaviour. It is an immensely tall order for many reasons not least of which are questions of scale and short-term versus long-term planning.
Humans occupy an intermediate position on a hypothetical planning continuum. At the very base most species react to immediate threat and opportunity situations. Some more complex non-human species (fish, birds, mammals) have developed what looks very much like longer-term planning by responding to suggestive environmental clues which presage seasonal changes in temperature or rain, etc. These responses are pretty stereotypical, however, and don't involve the more strategic planning of human decisions.