Two weeks after the cabinet reshuffle: Looking at the downgrade from an AGRICULTURAL perspective
18 April 2017
“The Cabinet reshuffle, which involved the replacement of the finance minister, Pravin Gordhan, and the deputy finance minister, Mcebisi Jonas, is likely to result in a change in the direction of economic policy ....” Jillian Green, Daily Maverick Managing Editor wrote on April 7, 2017 following the decision by President Zuma’s decision to reshuffle his cabinet.
Exactly a week after the reshuffle, a second rating agency, Fitch, announced on Friday April 7th that it downgraded South Africa’s long-term foreign and local credit rating from BBB- to BB+, which is classified as sub/non-investment grade - effectively taking the country’s investment status to ‘junk’. This follows Standard & Poor’s (S&P’s) decision on Monday April 3rd to downgrade South Africa’s sovereign credit rating to a similar rating status. Both S&P’s and Fitch cited current political events, which resulted to the reshuffle, as the major reason for their respective decisions to downgrade South Africa’s credit rating. In their view, they elieve current political event taking place in the country will weaken the standard of governance and public finances and ultimately lead to a change in the direction of economic policy which will undermine the progress that has been made in the last 12 months. During this period, there was a moment of economic stability in the country where the markets were responding positively to the fiscal order and discipline maintained by National Treasury especially curbing spending by the state-owned enterprises (SOE’s).
Being downgraded by two of the three major rating agencies (Moody’s being the third) means that South Africa is now generally consider as a ‘junk’ bond country by investors. Since the downgrade, financial stocks have lost billions and the local currency lost almost 10% of its value - moving closer to the (R14/$) mark as investors sold-off South African bonds. In addition, South African banks will also be impacted negatively by the downgrade in that in line with country’s downgrade, they have also been downgraded. In turn, this will make it more expensive for them to borrow money to lend out to individuals. This will effectively raise interest rate structure in the country at large, which will consequently dampen economic activities. On the other side, government will have to spend more money paying interest on its debt - meaning that it will have less available funds to spend on education, housing, infrastructure and social welfare - ultimately the poor are going to be the most adversely affect.
Currently, the economy is showing signs of recession as the country’s economic growth for 2017 has been revised to 0.2%. Unfortunately, this means unemployment rate is likely to increase further as the country will not be able to create new opportunities for employment, equally so companies, especially small businesses will be forced to cut down on their staff numbers and only keep those they see as highly productive. Typically, South Africa would have to grow its economy at least at a rate of 2% annually to be able to significantly reduce unemployment - as at the moment, this is a mammoth task something that is highly impossible.