The Importance of Leadership
A week ago one of the Professors from the Chicago School of Economics was brought out to Zimbabwe to give a series of lectures on what makes a country or a company successful. This was no ordinary economist - he was a Nobel Laureate in economics. I attended one of his talks and the content is still running through my mind.
He started out by saying that he was really a mathematician - not an economist and that he had to admit that in his view sociology was much more important in economics than science or mathematics. The point he was making was that all economic activity was driven by human action and management. The successful country or firm was a direct result of human leadership. He also made the important point that the most successful models all had the same characteristics - they were highly devolved with authority and decision making dispersed down to the lowest units in the society or company.
At the end of his talk, he listed the characteristics of those countries or companies that had failed to deliver a better standard of life to their people or employees. This list was not long but the people at my table, all senior executives from major companies, groaned aloud - we could tick every box for our country. Some of them may have been thinking about their own corporate experiences!
Here in Zimbabwe we have had some experience of the failure of leadership in our national affairs. Mr. Mugabe has been in absolute control of the State for the past 34 years - that is twice as long as Ian Smith and a third longer than Mr. Rhodes lived in Africa. The country has had two short bursts of growth and stability - the 10 years from 1980 to 1990 when he was forced to share power with the remnants of the Rhodesian settler regime by the Lancaster House Constitution and then the four years up to 2013 when he was forced to share power with the MDC.
But even in these periods he was the main actor on this stage and in all of these years his leadership has been dismal. He has taken what was a small, middle income country with a diversified economy, a well developed infrastructure and a good nucleolus of both national health and education institutions and reduced it to a near failed State.