Of apologies, foreign policy and domestic interest
As President of the Republic of South Africa who is empowered by our constitution to be ultimately responsible for our foreign policy and our international relations, President Cyril Ramaphosa has been issuing apologies to the peoples of Africa and the world for what is supposed to be our greatest cruelty against foreign nationals.
Albeit without our consultation on the matter, he has done so - as he declared - on our behalf. He didn’t see it fit to consult with ordinary South Africans for their feelings and opinions on this important question. He seems out of touch with ordinary people who must live in squalor with foreign nationals and compete with them for scarce resources.
It is ordinary people who must contend with crime and criminality that is perpetuated by some foreign nationals in their midst. It is ordinary people whose children are fed Nyaope and turned into roaming zombies by some foreign nationals. It is ordinary people whose young girls are abducted and turned into prostitutes by some foreign nationals. It is also ordinary people whose children are killed for illicit trade in body organs.
But President Ramaphosa and his government, in their wisdom, find it apposite to ignore these ordinary South Africans and appease foreign interests at the expense of our national interests. The South African government’s long-lived approach that ensures that our foreign policy is first and foremost informed by our domestic interests in our quest for mutually beneficial international relations, has seemingly been abandoned at the altar of political expediency. We are now expected to go around the continent and the world, cap in hand, apologising and explaining ourselves like a pitiful naughty child.
From the very beginning of the democratic state in South Africa, our approach to foreign policy has always been to ensure that our national interest guides our interaction, cooperation and participation in the SADC, Continental and international community of nations. We understood that the New World Order had both promises and uncertainties that would require us to promote mutually beneficial bilateral relations as dictated to by our national interests.