As a former Human Rights Commissioner who shared the privilege of being a member of the first batch of Human Rights Commissioners with Pansy Tlakula, I am not at all surprised at the allegations against her as Head of the Independent Electoral Commission. A cocky, overly sensitive, intelligent and manipulative person, she too has been bitten by the bug of entitlement. I knew it would just be a matter of time, when she would follow the way of all flesh.
Now firmly in the lap of the ANC, when in fact her political genesis started elsewhere, in her state of weakness, she is vulnerable to manipulation by the ruling party. Bantu Holomisa's demands that she should be fired will fall on deaf ears because she is exactly the type of useful idiot the ANC will court to seduce into the ways of the ANC arriviste.
Her bette noire blanc, the equally cocky Raenette Taljaard, has allegedly also fallen into the trap of double dipping, according to a recent report in the Beeld. This is common practice in the commissions as oversight is weak and accountability slack. Such is the nature of the Chapter 9 Institutions. Structured across Parliament and government, they are fatally flawed creating many loopholes for corruption to occur. These structural flaws in the operations and management of their mandates generate unnecessary tensions and rivalries between commissioners and the secretariat. Hence it is difficult to pull a commission together as their operations are often at loggerheads with each other. Their arbitrary budgets also make a mockery of their roles as accountability structures.
Back to Tlakula and Taljaard - both have histories of political entitlement and are the victims of limitless hubris, and they also happen to be our Electoral Commissioners. Their task is to provide the public with the utmost confidence that our elections will be free and fair. With Pansy Tlakula at the head, I have no such confidence. Taljaard exacerbates my mistrust! The impending strike from IEC staff indicates how disgusted they are with their less than exemplary leader. A microscopic scrutiny into the goings on of the Commissions is long overdue. Some are governed like fiefdoms and tyrannies, when they should be promoting constitutionalism.
The Commission of Gender Equality was a case in point. The incipient rivalry between the CEO and the head of the Commission was toxic and an out of court settlement was the better option to ensure both her survival and the commission's.
Loaded with full-time and part-time commissioners, they absorb what little revenue we have. They deliver nothing if the country reports to the UN are anything to go by. Not one of the chapter 9 institutions, except the Public Protector, has done anything to boost the human rights trajectory in SA, or has come up with a strategy to turn this epidemic around.