By all accounts, Jeremy Gordin ("In defence of political reporting (and political reporters,)" PoliticsWeb, October 2) is doing a fine job at the Daily Sun. I understand that it is difficult, these days, to find a sports piece or even a weather report in that worthy rag that doesn't have at least one mention of a tokolosh.
Unfortunately, Jeremy's rich yeshiva background tends to make him a tad argumentative at times and prone to a certain, Talmudic style of logic that can, in the hands of a talmid chacham, turn a sow's ear into a silk purse -or at least into a seemingly convincing argument that, actually, makes little sense.
There is no doubt that the old-time worthies that Jeremy mentions (Ken Owens, Allister Sparks, Tony Heard etc.) were fine journalists who went out on a very precarious limb in the 60s, 70s and 80s. It's probably true to say that they played a role in the downfall of apartheid, though the extent of their contribution is debatable. Jeremy and I could polish off many fine bottles of cognac arguing that very point.
The problem is that they all, without exception, practiced the very political journalism that the bigwigs at Times Media want to spike - though the tone of the debate may well have plummeted in recent years. My memory is not what it was, but I'm pretty sure that Allister Sparks never wrote about shit buckets and teachers obsessed with teenage sex. Ditto Patrick Lawrence, John Kane-Berman et al. They lived in a different universe to that of the Daily Sun.
Political journalists have always covered the thinking and activities of politicians - that's why they're called political journalists. The material with which they work is seldom illuminating, occasionally titillating, but mainly boring. Politicians are not very interesting people and their concerns are not those of the guy shitting into a bucket. Which means that the more political coverage there is in a newspaper, the less interesting it is to most readers.
Andrew Bonamour and Kuseni Dlamini seem to be on the right track in wanting to reduce the amount of political goo in their newspapers. I haven't been following the debate, but I wouldn't be surprised if their intention is to move their papers closer to the model of none other than Jeremy Gordin and his colleagues at the Daily Sun.