Recently we have had to put up with stories in both electronic and the print media that are meant to empower us, as citizens, to stand up against the "crisis of leadership". Most commentators, analysts and even leading politicians agree that there is a crisis facing our country - a crisis of poverty, unemployment and rising levels of inequality.
However there is a huge divergence among the role players when it comes to the true root causes of this crisis. What the press, commentators and others have told us is that the lack of leadership (political) in South Africa is responsible for this triple crisis we face.
We have no problem facing up to the agenda that these role players are agitating for. They have never believed in the leadership capabilities of the current ANC collective in any case and consequently they are not being honest in their evaluation. Our responsibility is to organize our people so that they can see this agenda for what it is: another attempt to stop the election of a particular candidate we are all told incessantly not to like, not to trust and that he cant lead, period.
This time around however the attempt is more sophisticated. It plays to people's emotions and seeks to focus on the very real issues and problems on which we are all agreed are a challenge that requires to be tackled. While we are all agreed that things are tough, it is incorrect to blame a particular leader for the systemic challenges in the South African economy and society at large. Framed in such emotional terms this flawed narrative can appeal to ordinary folk who find themselves stranded in poverty.
But what concerns us here is the use of the downgrading of South Africa's credit ratings by several ratings agencies, including Moody's. This sub-narrative is being used to corroborate the main storyline about the crisis of leadership.
Let us recall that the same agency also downgraded South Africa in the run up to the 52nd ANC Conference in Polokwane. At that time the downgrade was used to tell the nation, and ANC members going to Polokwane, not to vote for a particular candidate. Same line, same agency, same papers, same ANC delegates. Why must they listen to it this time around?