From the margins
31 May 2018
"When one turns to the magnificent edifice of the physical sciences, and sees how it was reared, what thousands of disinterested moral lives of men lie buried in its mere foundations; what patience and postponement, what choking down of preference, what submission to the icy laws of outer fact are wrought into its very stones and mortar; how absolutely impersonal it stands in its vast augustness, - then how besotted and contemptible seems every little sentimentalist who comes blowing his voluntary smoke-wreaths, and pretending to decide things from his private dream!”
William James wrote these extravagant words in 1896 in an essay entitled "The Will to Believe" dealing mainly with religion. This was at the time that the immense wave of discovery in the physical sciences was building up towards its peak in the first half of the 20th century, and the established religions, with their reliance on faith and passion, seemed to him the antithesis of the glorious cathedral of evidence-based science being built by the great physicists.
Well what's changed since then beyond the fact that the wave cresting now is more biological than physical and that the 'magnificent edifice' of physics was used in the mass genocide of fellow human beings? Or that the passions and dogmas of the traditional religions have seamlessly mutated into secular political doctrines? So nothing is as simple as it seems and secular 'rationality' can and has been used in the service of unreason and tyranny.
These thoughts are occasioned partly by the very recently published book by David Reich entitled 'Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the new science of the human past'. I'm fairly sure that relatively few PW readers have heard of David Reich, though ALL of you have heard of Malema, which just shows how inadequately our world is interconnected.