The Consumerist Revolutionary
Democracy is under threat by the Zuma warriors of South Africa and their game of state capture, but also by South Africa’s radical students. Student collusion with Zuma has been acknowledged in the press leading to the question of terms of alliance. What do student revolutionaries have in common with Jacob Zuma? To risk an answer demands a fresh, and indeed globalized look at student radical activities.
What began as a call to dismantle colonial legacies at universities and then became a battle over financial issues has also morphed into a demand for safe educational spaces in which students may learn behind closed doors, banishing all influences and people they believe are historically offensive and anachronistic. These student politics are global. The Rhodes Must Fall campaign catalysed events in America and the UK. In turn, the call for safe educational spaces here in South Africa is partly imported from America, and in a corrupted, consumerist version that needs to be carefully understood.
The idea of a safe space has a long history in Europe and the United States, beginning with Virginia Woolf’s famous room of one’s own, in which she wrote of the need for women, and especially women writers (or otherwise creative people) to find a place of retreat from the demoralizing pressures of men.
First generation feminism in the United States picked up this thread, and from the 1960s through the 1980s a great deal of talk about—and making of--women’s rooms, spaces, retreats and the like took place. Not without just cause. Anyone who has sat through dinner parties, or public meetings in either America or South Africa knows how often men talk only to other men, how women cannot get a word in edgewise, and when they do the men respond without looking at them, as if their voices were anonymous and unworthy of identification.
Women chronically endure this in a state of exasperation or, more usually, boredom--hence the attraction of an all-woman space from which men are excluded. Identity politics seeks safe spaces with locked doors where people often at the margins can speak front and centre to each other, especially about their marginality. These spaces can be confidence building and create solidarity. They are almost always the result of genuine offence taken by those who have been marginalized and a way of shutting the door of the safe space to lock out the offensive parties.