If the headline to Iqbal Jassat’s “The media must not be held hostage by the pro-Israel lobby” were a true reflection of reality, one would gather that “the media” in this country took its orders from the mere 69,000 who constitute the local Jewish community.
In Hebrew there is an expression, “alevai” which, loosely translated means, “were it only so”. The fact that no local major newspaper has a Jewish editor nor owner is clearly and conveniently overlooked.
The essence of Jassat’s article is an op-ed by David Saks in “a local Jewish weekly” (The Jewish Report) which deals with a meeting between members of the SA Jewish Board of Deputies and the SA Zionist Federation with Iqbal Surve’, the owner of Independent News and Media which prints both the The Star and Cape Times. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the mounting anti-Israel bias within the stable of Independent papers and specifically in the two aforementioned.
Those of us who have religiously read either of these publications over the decades are well aware of this hostile, anti-Israel / pro-Palestinian shift, familiar as we are of the daily dynamics that emanate from Israel and the Middle East.
When Surve’ emphasised that Independent Media did not have a policy of being either pro-Israel or pro-Palestinian and, indeed, actively guarded against this occurring, it was agreed that an external media analysis of the two papers be undertaken by the independent, researched-based organization, BaseMedia to examine all coverage retrospectively and for the following six months.
Almost from the outset, a systematic bias against Israel within The Star and Cape Times specifically, was clearly identified. The report went so far as to state that “negativity on Israel in each newspaper emerged in opinion/editorial pieces” with the only counter opinion coming from letters to the editor. In reality, the newspapers themselves were thus “a key in driving negativity on Israel.” It stated further, “In order to strive for some balance, there is a need for editorial/opinion coverage that is not so one-sided but more constructive in terms of framing issues.”