The end of the shared vision on the 1994 settlement
Various events during 2017 highlighted the fact that the shared vision around the (understanding) and interpretation of the historic settlement of 1994, as recorded in the Constitution, has come to an end. The underlying reason for it is to be found in the conflicting opinions on what the wording in the Constitution really means.
The former NP government regarded trading minority protection for majority rule as being the essence of the settlement. For the NP, the Constitution was a negotiated compromise to resolve the conflict in the country and was the end of a process that had created a new democracy in which everyone’s rights would be guaranteed. The pillars of the new democracy were the rule of law and an independent judiciary, the entrenchment of a market economy and of property rights, language protection and cultural freedom, and the Bill of Human Rights to protect all citizens.
The Afrikaners who were concerned that their fundamental rights were not being protected effectively, had been reassured that, given the circumstances, the settlement reached was a miracle with the best constitution in the world as its outcome. Motivation for calling the settlement a miracle was grounded in the argument that Afrikaans would enjoy the status of an official language, that mother tongue education would be protected by providing single-medium education institutions, that constitutional institutions, e.g. Section 9 institutions, would be created to among others, protect linguistic and cultural communities, that workplace equality would be guaranteed and that there would even be recognition for the principle of self-determination for persons belonging to cultural groups.
A negotiated revolution
The ANC, on the other hand, regarded the constitutional settlement as a “negotiated revolution”and a key point of departure- rather than the end of change. Significantly, President [Nelson] Mandela at the time said that freedom had not yet been attained, but the freedom to become free had been gained. Where the NP saw the settlement as the end of political change, the ANC saw it as the beginning of their “National Democratic Revolution”, or after their 2012 Mangaung Congress, the radical second phase of transformation.