As today marks a full year since the signing of the “Agreement with the SRC Candidates/Shackville TRC and other student formations” (“the agreement”), contemplation of the contours of the agreement, implementation thereof, and the implications for UCT’s future appear to be in order.
The impetus to the negotiations that produced the agreement was that most UCT operations in late 2016 had been shut down by violent protests by a small group of disaffected “students”. Completion of the academic year was in peril, and VC Dr. Max Price elected to “engage” intensively with a number of students, all of whom had been involved, in one way or another, with the protests, and most of whom had been disciplined by the university, and/or had multiple criminal charges pending against them.
The negotiations spanned several weeks, culminating in The Agreement. During this period, the university remained shuttered, a consequence of which was that UCT was the only South Africa university that failed to complete the academic year in time, if at all in several departments.
From the outset, questions about the legitimacy of the negotiations, and the subsequent Agreement, were raised. Reference to “other student formations” was felt to be fundamentally flawed in that the only (student ) parties to the negotiations and Agreement were violent, law-breaking individuals. Neither the then-current SRC, nor any other legitimate student groups ( or “formations”, as Price repeatedly referreds to them ) were consulted. The student members of the team were, in effect, wholly unrepresentative of the wider student body.
Another concern was that the negotiations were held in secret, this veil being lifted only with publication of the signed Agreement.
Price also not only supported, but actively advanced, the granting of bail to a particularly, (and repeatedly) violent demonstrator who was in police custody pending criminal charges of a serious nature. This individual was a member of the negotiating team, and signatory to The Agreement.