The classic scapegoats that politicians and some political commentators instinctively grasp at when they, or those they support, are under pressure have been properly delegitimised over the years. Jan van Riebeeck and apartheid can by no means be held responsible for, amongst other things, the ANC’s record of chronic corruption or for the spectacular decay of municipalities and state-owned enterprises. Although many can see through these blame-shifting fallacies it unfortunately does not mean that everybody immediately realises when a new scapegoat has entered the field.
One such a new scapegoat, apparently in the same class as Jan van Riebeeck in terms of all-encompassing, long-lasting influence, is former president Jacob Zuma and his gang of “conspirators”. Don’t get me wrong, I fully realise the giant role Zuma played in state capture and the destructive decay that took place under his administration.
However, it has now been four years since Ramaphosa has been at the helm of the country after having been Zuma’s vice president. It is thus absurd to absolve him of accountability simply due to the pathetic record of his predecessor.
It is also very short-sighted to blame everything from the Parliament building that went up in flames to the petrol price that skyrocketed on Zuma’s “dastardly RET faction”. When will President Ramaphosa and his administration be held accountable for the continuing deterioration in almost every area under their watch, since the break of the “new dawn”?
The president’s defenders argue that Ramaphosa is a moderate leader within the ANC and that he is slowly changing the course of the ship with his “long-term strategy”. Let’s evaluate these statements against the background of Ramaphosa’s comment during a 2018 interview where he stated that “I’d rather be seen as a weak president than to split the ANC.”
Since Ramaphosa’s administration took over in 2018 we have witnessed the following: