The Future of Trump’s Revolution against the Establishment
Both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton desperately wanted to be president. The difference between them was that Clinton thought the presidency was hers by right, while Trump knew that he would have to fight for it. And fight he did.
The assumption of divine right didn’t leave Clinton with too much to say in public. After all, feudal rulers never really spoke to the peasants and would have had a very hard time justifying themselves if they had. Instead, they granted favors to the nobility, who granted lesser favors to their knights, and so on down the chain. The end result was a top-down system of patronage, powered by self-interest and mutual plunder, serfs excluded.
Such was the nature of Clinton’s pre-ordained road to the White House. Before taking her case to the public – an unfortunate necessity these days and one that cost her dearly – she spent years nailing down the fealty of big money, the country’s economic elite and the power brokers (read nobility) of the Democratic Party. With few exceptions, all understood the reciprocal obligations – and potential benefits – of the Clinton power structure.
The last year of the campaign was meant to be Hillary’s triumph, in the old Roman sense of the word. It was going to be a grand tour of her estates, chatting with the vassals – telling them how much she loved them and how good life would be under her reign – and impressing them with her trappings of power.
The rebel Sanders with his egalitarian ideas spoiled the party for a while, but he was eventually put to the sword. And Trump, the mutinous offspring of the merchant classes, was treated with the disdain appropriate to a grubby, greedy and illegitimate pretender to the throne.