Zimbabwe Renewal - Accountable Institutions
This is the last in a series of 7 letters that have dealt with what we need to do to get Zimbabwe back on track with regard to its international relations and internal growth and recovery. In this letter, I want to deal with the need for strong and accountable institutions that will serve the people of Zimbabwe in the broadest sense. Strong in the sense that they can stand on their own feet and defend their areas of interest and concern.
At present our institutions fail on both counts virtually across the board. If we start with our national centers of power, the Executive (the Presidency and Cabinet), the Judiciary and the House of Assembly (Parliament). We have lived in an autocratic State for so long that we do not know what it is to have a leadership that cares and responds to our everyday problems and issues. Our Presidency is simply too strong and in fact suborns all the other institutions in the State.
The "strong man" mentality is a problem in many countries in Africa and in particular in those countries that have a liberation war background. I do not think I would find many in Zimbabwe who would deny that our central problem has always been and currently is, leadership in the form of our President who simply will not let go. Smith was the same and until he was politically neutered in 1976, no progress was possible. We are back in that position today.
This situation filters down to the other institutions of State power - the Judiciary and Parliament. The former, because they are compromised by politically motivated appointments, patronage and corruption, this in turn permeates down through the lower ranks of the judicial system to the Magistrates Courts where it is possible today to bribe both prosecutors and Magistrates to get the decisions you want.
Examples of political interference in the judicial system are too numerous to mention here. Many Magistrates and prosecutors are doing their jobs courageously and professionally, but few in Zimbabwe would say today that they would expect impartial justice from our bench at any level.