LAND CEILINGS A POLITICAL DAYDREAM
29 January 2015
"The ANC's position, namely that ownership of farm land should be limited to two farms per owner and a maximum of 12 000 hectares in order to accelerate land distribution, is totally unacceptable to the agricultural sector and could be detrimental to the economy and the interests of consumers. This statement issued yesterday by the ANC secretary-general, Mr Gwede Mantashe after the party's lekgotla, also undermines the credibility of the current consultation process between the Minister of Rural Development and Land Affairs, Mr Nkwinti, and role players in the industry, which aims to put together a package of practical measures aimed at making a success of land reform," says Agri SA president Johannes Möller.
In his reaction to this announcement, Möller referred to various events and the agreed-upon modus operandi that relate to the land debate and which are not reconcilable with this policy statement:
The National Development Plan makes no provision for a limitation on land ownership by legal entities in order to make land available for redistribution. However, this plan does have a proposal for promoting redistribution per district, which has been debated intensively over the past year within agriculture and is finding application on a trial basis. Various other models which meet the criteria for economic sustainability and lasting empowerment are also being implemented at present.
In the NAREG consultation process, which followed on the Green Paper on Land Reform, the Department of Rural Development and Land Reform ordered an independent study into the viability and implications of land ceilings. This study showed that such a measure was contrary to market forces and would deprive farmers of the opportunity to utilise economy of scale, which in turn is essential to remain profitable and to produce food as cheaply as possible. A limitation on farm size and further direct interferences with ownership will probably increasingly lead to higher levels of protection and support for agriculture, weaker export performance, greater dependence on imports and more expensive food.