NUMSA is demanding an in-depth SIU investigation into Public Enterprises Minister Pravin Gordhan for the shady Takatso deal
15 March 2024
The National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA) has noted the announcement made by the minister of Public Enterprises, Pravin Gordhan that the deal to sell a 51% stake of SAA to the Takatso consortium, has been terminated. As a union which has been consistently raising the alarm over the secrecy surrounding this deal, we feel vindicated and we welcome the news. NUMSA worked with the South African Cabin Crew Association (SACCA) as a progressive labour block to oppose this deal and to oppose privatization of SAA. We welcome this announcement because we have succeeded in achieving this major milestone, which was to prevent SAA from being privatized.
However, we are not satisfied with the explanation given by Minister Pravin Gordhan on the SAA deal. It is very clear to us that there are a lot of unanswered questions which require an in depth investigation. This is why NUMSA is demanding that the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) must investigate the deal. It doesn’t matter that it has been terminated, it was terminated simply because Gordhan was about to be exposed. More than three thousand jobs were lost to justify the privatization of SAA. Those workers are still suffering and we are demanding accountability for decisions taken by Gordhan. We need to make sure that no other minister abuses his power in the manner in which Gordhan has. We have a duty to protect our SOE’s from malfeasance.
Below are some of the areas that we think the SIU investigation should focus on:
1. Gidon Novick, founder of Lift, a rival airline to SAA confirmed in an interview on Newzroom Afrika with Xoli Mngambi that they as a consortium, did not initiate the engagement with the Department of Public Enterprises. He confirms that they were approached by an official, of the DPE and invited to bid. This official instructed him to get together with Harith and form a consortium. This is a major red flag because it suggests the deal was dubious from the start. The DPE as the custodian of SAA cannot be the one to approach potential bidders and encourage them to bid. From the remarks made by Novic, it is clear that the DPE engineered the creation of the Takatso consortium by bringing these parties together, and as the public, we deserve to know why. Whose interests are being advanced?