CENTRE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND GLYNNIS BREYTENBACH
The Centre for Constitutional Rights (CFCR) - a unit of the FW de Klerk Foundation - would like to confirm that it has been paying the litigation expenses of Adv Glynnis Breytenbach, in her efforts to defend herself against disciplinary action that has been taken against her by her employer, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA).
It has done so in pursuit of its mission of promoting and defending the Constitution and the rule of law. Among other activities the Centre monitors all developments that it believes might threaten the Constitution and the values that it represents. It does so by scrutinizing new legislation to ensure that it is constitutionally compliant; by studying the judgments of our courts; and by opposing any action by the state or by anyone else within the broader society that it believes might have a negative impact on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the rule of law.
The CFCR also participates actively in the national debate on constitutional issues by publishing articles in the media, by providing comment on radio and television, and by arranging or participating in conferences on constitutional matters.
Where appropriate - and within the scope of its limited means - it takes active steps to assist South Africans to claim their constitutional rights and to ensure that the state and all the institutions that it comprises, act in accordance with the Constitution. The CFCR has assisted ordinary citizens whose constitutional rights have been breached; it has laid complaints with the South African Human Rights Commission and the Public Protector, and where necessary it has also made use of the courts as a last resort.
For example, the CFCR was recently involved as amicus curiae in the case of the Cape Bar Council v the Judicial Service Commission on the crucial question of the manner in which judges are appointed; and it initiated litigation in the Labour Court on behalf of coloured employees of the Department of Correctional Services in the Western Cape who had been refused promotion because of their race. (The case was subsequently joined with the case of the Solidarity trade union on behalf of other employees of the DCS).