Constitutional Court forces education stakeholders to cooperate, says FEDSAS
Better communication and cooperation between education departments and school governing bodies is at the heart of today's Constitutional Court ruling in the case between the Gauteng Education Department and Rivonia Primary School in Johannesburg.
The case originated in 2011 when the school, according to the school's admission policy (which also includes requirements for classroom capacity), refused admission to a Grade 1 learner. The parent then lodged a complaint with the Gauteng Education Department and the MEC concerned, which led to Rivonia Primary School being forced to admit the learner.
The school took the matter to the South Gauteng High Court, which ruled in favour of the provincial education department. However, the Supreme Court of Appeal did not agree and ruled that admission policy is a function of a school's governing body. The case then went on to the Constitutional Court.
Today (03 October 2013) the Constitutional Court ruled that the head of an education department does have to authority to instruct a school principal to admit a learner to a school, but that the Gauteng HOD did not follow procedure in the Rivonia case. The governing body of Rivonia Primary School is a member of the Federation of Governing Bodies of South African Schools (FEDSAS).
"The Constitutional Court has now brought clarity to the interpretation of article 5 of the Schools' Act. In short it means that a governing body has the function of creating an admission policy, but that the education department still maintains control over the application of the admission policy. However, provincial education heads have to use a school's policy as guideline when decisions are made," says Mr Paul Colditz, CEO of FEDSAS.