Co-operation with other political parties: A contribution to the Congress of the People's strategy for winning political power
In recent weeks there has been heightened interest and debate on whether COPE should cooperate with, and possibly even merge with other opposition parties. The arguments for and against these possibilities have either been couched in terms of a re-alignment of the South African political terrain, or in some cases, in anachronistic positions that really relate to the pre-COPE era of politics. If it is to grow and to successfully challenge for power, COPE must co-operate with other parties, but it must do so on the basis of shared values, principles and policies.
There is no doubt that the launch of COPE changed the political terrain in our country. The formation of a progressive, left of centre party that could challenge the ANC, has inspired a new political enthusiasm in our country. The demoralization of many people due to the dramatic debasement of the once proud liberation movement and its increasingly bad track record in terms of governance, was turned around by the emergence of COPE. COPE's new agenda for hope and for change was successful in that respect. The performance of COPE in the general election, while not enough to dislodge the ruling party, helped to ensure that the 2/3's majority the ANC sought was not gained. But it is only combined with other parties that COPE can exercise this power. Cooperation is therefore a necessity.
It is true that parties such as the DA, the ACDP, the FF, the IFP and the UCDP have a history of policy positions that COPE would not have supported. But it became clear during the election that the manifestos of the DA, UDM and the ID had a lot in common with COPE. Among these were;
- Defense of the constitution
- Eradicating poverty
- Rooting out corruption
- Ensuring good service delivery in; health, education, policing, local government and other areas
- Creating work and economic opportunities for all people
- Redressing past injustices perpetrated under apartheid and colonialism
Some of the potential differences between these parties on how to achieve these common objectives revolve around views on the role of the state. There is also a perceived difference on BEE and Affirmative Action. In discussions between these parties it has become clear that these differences are not of a strategic nature. COPE is committed to solving the problems that the people of our country face. It does not therefore stick to rigid policy positions such as nationalisation, but would consider the role of the state on a case by case basis. On broad-based black economic empowerment and affirmative action all these parties recognise the need for these measures but are clear that the ruling party has not implemented them properly, instead creating possibilities for corruption, nepotism and a culture of entitlement and mediocrity.
It is worth noting that realignment has happened before, leading to the formation of the DA, in the ANC leading to the formation of the UDM, the ID and recently COPE itself. The ANC cooperates with the FF+ and has with Azapo before today. There is no impediment to cooperating with any parties if they share most of COPE's vision, values and principles and there are no strategic or principled differences between COPE and them. Among the most important of these values and principles stated in COPE's manifesto are that it will;