Land Claims Court sends clear signal to Land Claims Commission
Agri SA welcomes a recent decision by the Land Claims Court regarding the payment of costs in a case where the Land Claims Commission pursued a dubious claim.
In the judgement handed down by Judge Gildenhuys on 30 April 2010, in the case of Midlands North Research Group and Others versus Kusile Land Claims Committee and The Regional Land Claims Commissioner of Kwazulu Natal and others, a group of landowners succeeded in an application for costs against the Commission on the basis that a number of properties were wrongly gazetted and the claim proceeded with despite valid objections by the landowners.
"Landowners have long been disadvantaged by the great cost involved in fighting dubious claims in Court," said Dr Theo de Jager, chairperson of Agri SA's Transformation Policy Committee. "It is hoped that this decision will encourage the Commission to deal speedily with a great number of applications for degazetting in terms of section 11A, which are before the Commission," he said. Dr De Jager also called for legal aid for landowners defending their constitutional rights against dubious claims.
In the relevant case, the claimants were labour tenants. The landowners contended that the claimants lived on portions of some of the farms and had no claim to the entire farms, but only to the portions they actually occupied and also that they had no shared rules and did therefore not qualify as a community. The Court found that the investigations into the claim by the Land Claims Commission had been inadequate.
Even though it has for many years been the approach of the Land Claims Court not to grant cost orders, because the Restitution of Land Rights Act is considered to be social- or public interest litigation, a cost order was granted in this case in favour of the landowners.