POLITICS

Court judgment confirms Masuku’s political negligence – Jack Bloom

DA MPL says ex-MEC is correct that no crime was directly linked to him, but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

Court judgment confirms Masuku’s political negligence

13 April 2021 

The North High Court’s dismissal of former Gauteng Health MEC Bandile Masuku‘s application to set aside the SIU report into PPE procurement irregularities in the Gauteng Health Department confirms his political negligence in this matter.

Masuku is correct that no crime was directly linked to him in the SIU report, but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and further investigations may reveal a different story.

At this stage we know that Masuku failed to stop the PPE scandal, which is confirmed by Judge Roland Sutherland’s scathing remarks in his judgment.

According to Sutherland, Masuku was “deaf and blind” to the risks of alleged irregularities in his department, and his failure to read his emails was prima facie “a confession of

unprofessionalism and dereliction of his duties.”

Judge Sutherland adds that Masuku’s “conduct shows a lack of judgment and diligence.”

Masuku is trying to rescue his political career, but this judgement shows that Premier David Makhura was correct to fire him as Health MEC.

A similar standard should be applied to other ANC politicians who have shamefully neglected their duties, including Gauteng Education MEC Panyaza Lesufi who failed to stop R430 million spent on unnecessary cleaning of schools.

Issued by Jack Bloom, DA Gauteng Shadow Health MEC, 13 April 2021