The DA notes the decision by the NPA to appeal the judgment in the Pietermaritzburg High Court that Jacob Zuma's prosecution was invalid. If there is a prima facie case against Jacob Zuma, the NPA is legally bound to explore every legal avenue to ensure justice is done.

Judge Nicholson noted in his judgment on Friday that the NPA has a duty to prosecute if it has a compelling prima facie case against the accused. There have been repeated statements that such a case exists against Jacob Zuma.

Any suggestion that the decision to appeal is a cynical move must be rejected with contempt. On the contrary, it shows that the NPA takes its duty to the South African public seriously and that it won't be intimidated by Zuma and his acolytes.  Zuma has instituted every possible appeal and delaying mechanism to avoid his day in court.  It is disingenuous now for the ANC to criticise the NPA for appealing this judgement.

The Zuma camp's jubilation has been premature. Judge Nicholson's judgement was not a vindication or an acquittal of Jacob Zuma.

There is a large cloud over Jacob Zuma's head. As he has repeatedly stated, he needs to defend himself in a court of law where the evidence can be presented.  It is therefore in the interest of all South Africans that he withdraws his candidature for the Presidency until his guilt or innocence has been established in court.

Statement issued by Helen Zille, Democratic Alliance leader, September 17 2008